Amit Shah is only a Face. Kejriwal should wait for another 10 years
The Delhi assembly election
drubbing for the BJP has once again repeated what it was in 2014-15. While
Delhi has given a go ahead to the governance model of Arvind Kejriwal and AAP,
the Delhites have maintained their stand of Modi and BJP at center. This was
proven by 7 Lok Sabha seats that the BJP won back to back in two General
Elections. On the other hand there is a
new topic which has indirectly emerged after AAP won in Delhi assembly. That is
“Is Arvind Kejriwal going to be the alternative to the so called Hindutva
politics of BJP through its brilliant model of subsidies/freebies on one side
and reformation in education and health care on the other side”?
To discuss this, let’s go slightly back in history where
India, since independence and especially since late 90s, post liberalization,
is been seen as a growing and fast emerging power in the world both in terms of
economy, defence, industries, research, space and almost everywhere (special
credit to Dr Manmohan Singh and his dream budget of 1991). Without any doubt, with every passing
instance India has been growing with a tremendous rate in the last 25-30 years.
Then the growth is not something without challenge. But despite challenges, we
need to understand India is a country of 135 crore people and the seventh
largest country in the world. India is a country with one of the most richest
resources available. Despite all challenges and even the worst form of
government, India will only grow. The demand is so high, the consumption
requirement is so high. The economy is so big, the market is just so huge.
Although I am not an economist, but we have seen two eminent economists (one as
PM and other as FM) taking GDP growth to as low as 4.3%, a tea-seller PM taking
the country to the fastest growth in 5 years as well as down to 10 years low
GDP growth. Economy or growth is never a problem for a country like India. What
is the problem ? In my sense the biggest problem to India is the Islamic
Fundamentalism. Not in the immediate 5 or 10 or 15-20 years, but after 25-30
years. I am not against any Muslim or Islam. Neither I say that India which has
a Hindu Majority, doesn’t have Hindu Fundamentalism. Of course there is. There
is a strong hard line Hindu fundamental brigade which is as strong as Islamic
Fundamentalism in India. But we have to understand from history and statistics around
the world, that India is a growing economy and will be a growing economy only
because it’s a non-Islamic majority. Had Hindu fundamentalism been so
threatening as Islamic, India would have been a Hindu state way back in 1960s
with more than 80% Hindu population. There are around 55-56 defined Islamic
countries across the world and we know, how much developed they are and how
much disturbed they are. And we also know a country with more than 50% Muslim
population is ultimately an Islamic country and there will be no democracy. It is the deliberate attempt to change the
demography of India which as per me poses a major threat to the success of
India in coming years. Hindu majority and other minorities (except Muslims)
have had their laws reformed over the year despite hard line. However this hasn’t
happened in case of Muslims. But unless few things do not come under law, legal
action cannot pursue against them. And that is primarily because of appeasement
politics for Muslims to garner vote bank. When I mention changing the
demography, I am not referring to the high growth in fertility of Muslims
compared to Hindus, that will never be a threat because that is a natural
process. Threat comes when few political parties try to change the demography
of the country forcefully through infiltration, allowing muslim personal law
board directions, instead of legal laws, so that it allows them to fill their
vote bank. This leads to further threats like dissolving the original culture
and civilization of this country through changing the history in a biased way
(Refer to my write-up: https://generalanupam1980.blogspot.com/2019/06/hinduism-shame-for-hindus.html).
These are the few points where the title of my write up actually gets its base.
Having mentioned the problems above, the solution is very
simple. Start reforming muslim laws (just like Hindu reformations), relieve the
country of boundations that were created for temporary duration, implement
actions. When I say reform, I do not refer to crimes. Crimes will happen,
society cannot be crime free, and how strict the legal system is (different
topic altogether) will define how crimes can be controlled. So, although I mentioned
the solution is very simple above in my terms, is it really so for Islam ? When
the entire religion has been under the control of fanatic muslims and Muslim
Personal Law Board ? No, its not, there will be fierce opposition from Muslims,
and that is happening. That is why a Shah Bano case verdict of Supreme Court
had to be reverted by the then government. So, what is the solution. Congress
had 55 years to rule India, but they didn’t do anything. Because their primary
vote bank are Muslims. Similar is the situation with most of the current
religious parties especially in Assam, Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir
and many states. Everyone knows BJP is the only party that can do so. However
it is also a case that if these states have been considered 30-40 years back by
congress, it would have been much easier, the muslim population was lower and
these steps would have minimum repurcussions and betterment for the country
over all. But today the situation is different. The muslim population of the
country unofficially is at around 16-17%, which includes a huge percentage of
illegal immigrants bought in as vote bank. It is difficult, very difficult.
With radical Islam, even a slight comment on their radical laws, brings in huge
opposition. This has a big support from the Left, which by default is always
anti-majority religion in a country. But still now these has to be done.
Despite fierce opposition. Only problem is, what has been built on fire over
years, will end on with fire. This is exactly where Amit Shah as Home Minister
of our country comes in. Good or bad, to implement ban on Tripple Talaq, implementation
of NRC to control illegal immigration, Uniform Civil Code, Article 370 and many
such issues pending for years and years are being done. Much needed for the
overall and uniform development of the country. And as expected there is fierce
opposition. None of these laws have anything to do with anything against
Muslims or any religion of India or any of India’s citizens. But the opposition
will come because of opposition’s brainwashing and Muslim fundamental pogrom to
incite a feeling amongst the muslims of India that soon India will be a Hindu
Rashtra and there will be no place for Muslims. That is exactly what happened.
Assam was the only state that could have had some impact, because Assam is a
different ball game. They are really concerned about their culture and
destruction of it. But while it started with Assam, we ultimately saw a
peaceful Assam but Muslims across the country doing violence. The purpose:
provoke Hindu Radical groups to retaliate and then bring the government in the
eyes of the world an play victim card, so that International pressure is mounted
on Mr Narendra Modi for seizing power as the ruling government of India. But
that didn’t happen. The left, urban naxal groups and congress who invoked the
opposition forgot one thing that while Hindus are more consolidated under Modi,
they now also realize few of these things. So while in 95% cases, there was no
retaliation from Hindus, Delhi violence on the eve of US president visit,
turned into a riot.
So the second question comes in is why BJP did not do it in
its first tenure (14-19) or if it is doing now, why is the party in such a
hurry. The answer to this question lies in the fact that BJP would have always
done it, but its always a numbers game plus creating a base. BJP as a party is
very calculative. In fact many say, they have all the calculations done for
2024 elections, while other parties are doing for 2019. If we take Article 370,
the base was created starting from coalition with PDP in 2016 and how by being
part of government of Kashmir, separatists were eliminated along with
terrorists were killed. BJP was pretty sure, they could not do it then, as they
don’t had the numbers in the upper house. BJP also knew they need to be in power in 2019 with greater number. So, This was aptly supported by PM Yojanas like Housing for all by 2022, Swacch Bharat/sanitaion, Jan Aushadhi yojana etc, which might not reflect in the real parameters of economics, but are steps that reach the poor of India, who have been ignored till now by all the parties and also basic requirements of a developed society ignored by everyone till date. Mr Shekhar Gupta: The one person who would not like to see Mr Modi as PM, before 2019 General Elections said: Since 2014 Benefit schemes launched are not just for launching but they have actually reached the needy. These needy include people irrespective of relgion and caste. Once this base was created, and the governemnt had the numbers post 2019, Tripple Talaq, CAA and
many of the bills that were passed in the first 6 months in the second term. And much more is coming in upcoming months. The current calculation also says that by mid of 2020, NDA will have 145
members in the upper house, which will allow them to pass as many such bills
and acts. Modi/Shah also knows, if these issues pending for 70 years are not cleared now, it will be very difficult to get such numbers in future. On the other hand Modi/Shah also know that if they do clear these bills, no one shall be able to touch them for next 50 years, since this for sure, no opposition, even if NDA loses in upcoming general elections, will get such numbers in parliament. This is one of the rarest times in India's history post independence, when it is possible, with a non-congress government in power.
While the need of the hour is to resolve issues pending for 70 years on priority (as they will ultimately block the future of India), the need of the hurry is, the loss in state assembly elections. Everyone, even a small children of India knows, how strong our federal system is and BJP knows It better. While Modi-Shah knows that they might be untouched in general elections for another 10 years, states might slip out of hands, as people vote on local issues in assembly elections. This will ultimately result in loss of majority in upper house and passage of these important and 70 years pending issues will become difficult. So despite the strong resistance they are getting these done. More importantly we should also remember, Ayodhya, article 370, triple talaq, UCC, population control bill has been the poll promises of BJP for last 20 years. By closing these, BJP is closing its own window of poll campaigns in future. And they will have to look for new promising things moving ahead.
While the need of the hour is to resolve issues pending for 70 years on priority (as they will ultimately block the future of India), the need of the hurry is, the loss in state assembly elections. Everyone, even a small children of India knows, how strong our federal system is and BJP knows It better. While Modi-Shah knows that they might be untouched in general elections for another 10 years, states might slip out of hands, as people vote on local issues in assembly elections. This will ultimately result in loss of majority in upper house and passage of these important and 70 years pending issues will become difficult. So despite the strong resistance they are getting these done. More importantly we should also remember, Ayodhya, article 370, triple talaq, UCC, population control bill has been the poll promises of BJP for last 20 years. By closing these, BJP is closing its own window of poll campaigns in future. And they will have to look for new promising things moving ahead.
So Mr Amit Shah is exactly doing the same, as our Home
Minister. A lot of negativity was to be produced across the country on these
bold stands by the left and opposition who in reality are frustrated if not
really concerned about any of the citizens. This negativity has to be assigned
to someone and that’s Mr Amit Shah. We should always remember, whatever bad
tongue is being used, that’s for Mr Shah and not Mr Modi. That is politics and
that is how politically things are designed. You put in front someone who will
act as a shield to the leader of the country. While the image of Mr Modi is not
disturbed, it will be Mr Shah whose will be deteriorated. Its similar to Mr
Pramod Mahajan during the Vajpayee era. And this is well planned too.
Coming back to Mr Kejriwal, although I do not currently stay
in Delhi, but it is said that Arvind Kejriwal has really turned on the model of
governance especially in education and health. Although I was a stern supporter
of Mr Kejriwal when he joined politics out of Anna movement, but today I am a
stern critic. For me, he is no different from the rest of the opposition.
However, since I am not really aware, if he has actually changed the way
politics is in India, it’s really good and definitely that should be how our
governance should be. But then what Mr Kejriwal will never do, is he will never
try to rectify the much required basic faults committed (as discussed till now)
in the post Independence history of India. Primarily because its like sitting
on atom bomb to explode, as we are already seeing in the country. Mr Kejriwal
is also worried about minority votes as many other opposition parties, so he
will avoid these things. So, while they are much needed and the current
government is doing, Mr Kejriwal can wait for another 5-10 years. If we are
able to rectify these changes now, few years later the governance model of Mr
Kejriwal that is being appreciated will really change the face of politics. If
we are not able to rectify the changes now, the governance model of Mr Kejriwal
or any clean politician will ultimately fail in the face of a strong Islamic
based law resistance moving ahead. We are already witnessing that in many place
in England, we saw Lebanon. In fact we have examples of 52 Islamic states. India had one state with Islamic majority, we saw what happened there in 1991. For those who understand, Kashmir 1991 is sufficient to believe. For those who don't understand, entire history can't make them understand
Comments
Post a Comment